DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008768501-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-13

000118697

Contested design: 008768501-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008768501-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

AH License ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Høgevej 19, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark

Represented by

Elmann IPR Law Firm

Holder · RCD owner

FB Group ApS

Denmark (DK)

Omega 9, Søften, 8382 Hinnerup, Denmark

Represented by

Niels Uth

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Pacifier shown in the article 'Det er min sut'

https://www.bt.dk/nyheder/det-er-min-sut · bt.dk · disclosed 2005-06-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying chiefly on an earlier pacifier disclosed online in Annex 3 before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the bt.dk article as a prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the informed user would see the same overall impression despite minor shape differences.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Articles 25(1)(b), 4(1) and 6(1)(b), so the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248