Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-15
000118817
Contested design: 008743694-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible and the filing fee is not refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Yong Jinvia PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Calle Santa Lucía 23, 3º C, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
Holder · RCD owner
Bingxiang Wang
China (CN)
No. 666, Xijie Village, Fangcheng Town, Lanshan District, Linyi 277725, China
Represented by
Isabelle Bertaux
Legal grounds invoked
From EUIPO API metadata.
Argument summary
- ›The applicant filed an invalidity application without the required reasoned statement, facts, evidence, and supporting arguments.
- ›The holder did not need to answer because the case was resolved on the applicant's failure to cure the procedural defect.
- ›The Division found that the applicant did not remedy the notified deficiency within the time limit, so the application was inadmissible under the procedural rules.
- ›The application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
- MemberElisabetta FERRARO
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000128896 vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl | 2025-08-18 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000124438 vs АУТДОР ПЛЕЙ | 2025-04-03 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000126927 vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd. | 2025-03-25 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121616 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-29 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121617 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-29 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121615 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-10 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000114244 vs UTILIS | 2024-01-09 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121427 vs Jinhua Baiwei Plastic Products Co., Ltd. | 2023-11-15 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |