DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001477129-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-16

000116572

Contested design: 001477129-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0014771290001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dynamic Biogas Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością Spółka komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Bóżnicza 12/4, 61752 Poznań, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Artur Ratajczak

Poland (PL)

Październikowa 10, 63230 Witaszyce, Poland

Prior art cited (3)

PatentD1

Fermentator gazowy

PL 230678 · Polish patent database · disclosed 2018-11-30

OtherD2

construction project of a biogas plant in Jaromierz, Poland

Interchangeable Construction Project Of Agricultural Biogas Plant 1,0 Mw · construction project / related website photographs

OtherD3

construction project of a biogas plant in Upałty Małe

Interchangeable Construction Project of Agricultural Biogas Plant 1,0 MW · construction project / construction-site photographs

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the reservoir section with a central mixing device was an invisible component of a complex gas-fermenter product and also lacked novelty and individual character over earlier project and patent disclosures.
  • The holder argued the contested design was itself a visible reservoir, challenged the complex-product theory and disclosure objections, and said the cited differences preserved individual character.
  • The Division rejected the Article 4(2) theory because the gas-plant configuration was not a complex product for this assessment, but it accepted D1's patent publication as prior disclosure and found the overall appearance of the reservoir section too similar.
  • The contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, making it unnecessary to determine the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238