DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006380663-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-29

000118618

Contested design: 006380663-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006380663-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Run Weivia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Gerlingstraße 41, 45127 Essen, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Xunte Web Tech Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongyi Auto Parts Square 07, Tianhe District Guangzhou, China

Represented by

Nan Li

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Aizik toilet paper holder

ASIN B07 B92 3LHR · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-08

Web disclosureD2

very similar toilet paper holder sold on Amazon

Amazon

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toilet paper holder lacked novelty and individual character in light of Amazon disclosures D1 and D2 predating the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted Amazon evidence for D1 as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad design freedom for toilet paper holders.
  • It held that the contested design produced the same overall impression as D1 on the informed user and therefore lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238