DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008605018-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-08

000118730

Contested design: 008605018-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086050180001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zhaoming Fangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 411, Human Resource Services Plaza No.29, Qinglin Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

CO LA Consulting

Michele Carella

Holder · RCD owner

Haiting Wang

China (CN)

G715, Hualian 27 District, Chuangye 2nd Road, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon.co.uk listing for 'Stroller Cup Holder' cup and phone holder

ASIN B0897GGD4F · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2020-05-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier Amazon.co.uk disclosure of a cup and phone holder under ASIN B0897GGD4F before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad design freedom for combined cup and mobile-phone holders.
  • It held that the compared designs shared the same main shapes and colour/material combination, and that the minor differences did not change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.0614.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078