DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008706162-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-15

000118778

Contested design: 008706162-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008706162-0009 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

S. Tous, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carretera de Vic, El Guix, 3, 08243 Manresa (Barcelona), Spain

Represented by

Baylos

Holder · RCD owner

Van Phuong Tranvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Legionów 10B, 05-552 Mroków, Poland

Represented by

Maciej Bocheński

Prior art cited (2)

Trade mark

figurative trade mark depicting the outline of a teddy bear

EUTM No 14 654 289 · EUIPO · disclosed 2015-10-07

Trade mark

figurative trade mark depicting a teddy bear

EUTM No 8 127 144 · EUIPO

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(c)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) CDR, arguing that the contested logo used its reputed earlier TOUS teddy-bear trade marks and would take unfair advantage of their distinctive character and repute.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the applicant had proved reputation in Spain for EUTM No 14 654 289 for jewellery, that the teddy-bear sign in the contested design was sufficiently similar, and that consumers would establish a mental link between the signs.
  • Because use of the contested sign for identical goods would free-ride on the earlier mark's attraction and reputation without due cause, the application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118777

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118720

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105120

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328