Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-10
000118959
Contested design: 009018757-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee is not refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Xarlyss Trading SLvia PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Calle Colon 26, 5D, 03001 Alicante, Spain
Holder · RCD owner
ZODM Technology Co., LTDvia PDF extraction
United Kingdom (GB)
Unit G1, Capital House, 61 Amhurst Road, London E8 1LL, United Kingdom
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant sought invalidity of Community design No 0090187570001 under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4(1).
- ›Holder filed no observations; the decision addresses only admissibility defects in the application.
- ›The Division found the filing lacked a reasoned statement of facts, evidence and arguments and that the applicant failed to cure the deficiency after invitation.
- ›The application was rejected as inadmissible, the appointed employee was removed for lack of authorisation, and the invalidity fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
- MemberLudmila CELISOVA
- MemberMichelle M. DELLACHERIE
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000125115 vs Mihua Li | 2024-07-31 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000123998 vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd. | 2024-05-16 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000122441 vs Piotr Malinowski | 2024-05-15 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000120698 vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd | 2024-01-25 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000108601 vs Wahl Clipper Corporation | 2023-07-31 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000120778 vs GUANGDONG HUANENGDA ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO.,LTD. | 2023-07-17 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000120758 vs Zhaojie Zhang | 2023-07-13 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |
| 000119166 vs Salon Europe Limited | 2023-06-09 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 28 | 7 |