DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-12

000117051

Contested design: 004352300-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted, Registered Community design No 004352300-0008 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 004352300-0008 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Picda, Crta. Nacional 340, s/n, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KG

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

YouTube video still showing a reusable rectangular shopping bag

YouTube · disclosed 2013-03-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested shopping-bag design had been publicly used long before filing and lacked novelty and individual character over earlier bag designs, especially a YouTube video still dated 27 March 2013.
  • The holder maintained that the contested design was new and individual, citing high market density, limited designer freedom for reusable shopping bags, and specific differences in material, handle attachment, size, and proportions.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube printout as a prior internet disclosure under Article 7(1), found designer freedom for shopping bags relatively broad, and considered the alleged market saturation unproven.
  • It held that the visible differences did not alter the overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098