DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008514798-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-23

000117306

Contested design: 008514798-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 008514798-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008514798-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Edeka Zentrale Stiftung & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

New-York-Ring 6, 22297 Hamburg, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Eckes-Granini Group GmbH

Germany (DE)

Ludwig-Eckes-Platz 1, 55268 Nieder-Olm, Deutschland

Represented by

Heinrich Prinz Reuss

Prior art cited (3)

OtherD1

older disclosed design

Web disclosureD2

orange drink bottles in a specific bottle shape

ASIN B00E1SZOSU · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2014-01-21

OtherD3

older disclosed design

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed designs D1, D2 and D3.
  • The holder argued the contested bottle design was new and individual, invoked a dense prior-art field, and said the cited designs created different overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted D2's Amazon disclosure, found substantial designer freedom for beverage bottles, and held the small differences did not alter the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098