Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-25
000117307
Contested design: 008513485-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Registered Community design No 008513485-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008513485-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Edeka Zentrale Stiftung & Co. KGvia PDF extraction
Germany (DE)
New-York-Ring 6, 22297 Hamburg, Deutschland
Holder · RCD owner
Eckes-Granini Group GmbH
Germany (DE)
Ludwig-Eckes-Platz 1, 55268 Nieder-Olm, Deutschland
Represented by
Heinrich Prinz Reuss
Prior art cited (3)
older disclosed beverage bottle design
Amazon.de offer for orange drink bottles in a specific bottle shape
ASIN B00E1SZOSU · Amazon.de · disclosed 2014-01-21
older disclosed beverage bottle design
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed bottle designs D1, D2 and D3.
- ›The holder argued the contested bottle remained new and individually distinctive, invoked a dense market for juice bottles, and said D1 to D3 were its own earlier designs merely modernized.
- ›The Division accepted D2's Amazon.de printout as a prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and, for procedural economy, assessed individual character only against D2.
- ›It found the contested bottle reproduced D2's decisive visual features and created the same overall impression, so the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.
Deciding panel
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
- MemberIvanka IVANOVA
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131325 vs HaoJun Zhu | 2026-05-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000131965 vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130985 vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130944 vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd. | 2026-02-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130968 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129539 vs MOHAMAR JAMOU | 2026-01-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130088 vs Mindful eCom OÜ | 2025-12-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129281 vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL | 2025-11-04 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |