DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007907183-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-23

000117373

Contested design: 007907183-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0079071830001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Joanna Rafalskavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Gen. Władysława Sikorskiego 26/64, 40282 Katowice, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Biovico Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Hutnicza 15B, 81061 Gdynia, Poland

Represented by

Małgorzata Matyka

Prior art cited (1)

PatentAnnex 7

surgical instrument workpiece with a hooked or crescent-shaped blade

PL 224646 B1 · Polish Patent Office database · disclosed 2017-01-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested surgical-instrument part lacked novelty and individual character because similar devices had been marketed earlier and Annex 7 disclosed the same hooked blade shape.
  • The holder challenged the applicant's evidence, argued Annex 7 was different and untranslated, and said technical constraints standardised many features of surgical devices.
  • The Division accepted Annex 7 as a prior disclosure, identified the informed user as someone familiar with surgical instruments, and treated the designer's freedom as average.
  • It found both designs created the same overall impression through the identical hooked tip, upheld the invalidity application, and declared the contested design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248