DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009106651-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-28

000119539

Contested design: 009106651-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009106651-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

62nordic sp/fvia PDF extraction

FO

Sudurrås 10, Torshavn 100, Faroe Islands

Represented by

Otello Law Firm

Holder · RCD owner

Nixon Bui

Denmark (DK)

Ebertsgade 3, 3th, 2300 Copenhagen s, Denmark

Represented by

Kønig Advokater I/S

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

article depicting a vodka bottle design

http://mandesager.dk · mandesager.dk weblog · disclosed 2020-12-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier online disclosure of a vodka bottle design.
  • The holder filed observations late; the Division declined to consider them and noted they would not change the outcome in any event.
  • The Division accepted Annex 3 as a prior web disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and compared the designs from the perspective of the informed user of alcoholic beverage bottles.
  • It found the similarities in bottle shape and label presentation decisive, held the contested design lacked individual character, and declared it invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberAlfonso CID GONZALEZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098