DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007905187-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-04

000117374

Contested design: 007905187-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 007905187-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 007905187-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Joanna Rafalskavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Gen. Władysława Sikorskiego 26/64, 40282 Katowice, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Biovico Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Hutnicza 15B, 81061 Gdynia, Poland

Represented by

Małgorzata Matyka

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Bone pulp guide with loader set for dry arthroscopy / surgical instruments

AR 201.60 / AR 201.3; AR 261.60 / AR 261.3 · Applicant invoices and brochure 'bs SET FOR CARTLAGE DEFECT REPAIR'

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested surgical-instrument design lacked novelty and individual character because her earlier bone-pulp-guide set had already been marketed, sold and publicly shown before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and similarity, invoked the Article 7(2) grace period, challenged the applicant's evidence, and argued that technical constraints and sector standards limited the designer's freedom.
  • The Division found disclosure established through the combined invoices and brochure, identified the informed user as someone familiar with surgical instruments, and treated the designer's freedom as average.
  • Comparing the instruments directly, the Division found the shared features dominated and the slight differences in the rectangular part did not alter the same overall impression, so invalidity was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248