DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007907167-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-13

000117376

Contested design: 007907167-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007907167-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Joanna Rafalskavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Gen. Władysława Sikorskiego 26/64, 40282 Katowice, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Biovico Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Hutnicza 15B, 81061 Gdynia, Poland

Represented by

Małgorzata Matyka

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Prior surgical instrument design disclosed as chondrectom fronts / small chondrectom fronts

BS 011.90 / BS 011.30 / BS 013.90 · Applicant invoices and brochure · disclosed 2018-08-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier marketing, sales, invoices, brochure material and fair display of her surgical instruments before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the cited disclosures were within the Article 7(2) grace period, insufficiently linked to the contested design, poor in quality, and incapable of showing the relevant design had been made available to the public.
  • The Division held that the invoices, read together with the brochure, sufficiently proved prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and treated the designer's freedom for surgical instruments as average.
  • Comparing the protected pointed portion of the contested design with the prior design, the Division found the same overall impression on the informed user and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248