DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007042114-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-24

000117674

Contested design: 007042114-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0070421140001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Brabantia Nederland B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Leenderweg 182, 5555 CJ Valkenswaard, Netherlands

Represented by

Nlo Shieldmark B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Homfel Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm.1210, Building A3, Poly Tal To Wun, 290 Hanxi Avenue East, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511495, China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

dustbin

RCD No 004422061-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-10-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 004422061-0001, supported by a 2018 price list showing marketed versions.
  • Holder challenged the untranslated evidence, denied sufficient disclosure, argued differences in the pedal and lid, and claimed a saturated dustbin sector limited designer freedom.
  • The Division accepted the evidence, found disclosure established by the earlier RCD's bulletin publication, and rejected the holder's sector-saturation evidence as insufficient.
  • The shared rectangular bin, framed lid and elongated front pedal produced the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098