DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009042310-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-31

000120499

Contested design: 009042310-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009042310-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

RISSLER SARLvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

1 Place du General de Gaulle, 67400 Illkirch Graffenstaden, France

Represented by

Hortense Bessiere

Holder · RCD owner

EAR Life Experiencevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

983 Chemin de Verneuil, 71850 Charnay Les Macon, France

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon.fr listing for a talking clock for Alzheimer / visually impaired persons packaging

ASIN B07V2NXS34 · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2019-07-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested packaging design had already been disclosed identically on Amazon.fr in July 2019, destroying novelty.
  • The holder filed no observations on the invalidity application despite receiving an extension of time.
  • The Division found the Amazon.fr printouts and ASIN evidence sufficient to prove public disclosure before the filing date and outside the grace period.
  • Because the prior and contested designs were identical in all relevant features, the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098