DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004124642-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-01

000118338

Contested design: 004124642-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community Design No 004124642-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 004124642-0001 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Castello s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sammichele 30, Turi, Italia

Represented by

TMShell

Holder · RCD owner

Societa' Generale delle Acque Minerali S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Salandra 1/A, 00187 Roma, Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

bottles

RCD No 002648576-0001 · EUIPO Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-03-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier RCD No 002648576-0001 for bottles and arguing that the contested bottle shape had already been disclosed.
  • The holder replied that the comparison should focus on the registered shape, that PET bottle features such as constriction and ribs were not mandatory technical constraints, and that the cited materials did not prove market saturation or identical prior designs.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed before the filing date, rejected the claimed market-crowding evidence as insufficient, and held that the designer retained broad freedom for the bottle body and decoration.
  • Comparing the overall impressions, the Division considered the differences in rings and ribs minor and concluded that the contested design lacked individual character, so the invalidity application was upheld in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098