DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008939474-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-01

000121361

Contested design: 008939474-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008939474-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Anker Innovations Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 701, 7F building7, 1st phase of Headquarters Building of Changsha, Zhongdian Software Park Co., Ltd., No. 39 Jianshan Road, Changsha National High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Changsha, China

Holder · RCD owner

Ace Kingvia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Napoli n. 42, 65121 Pescara, Italy

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

charging station

Chinese design patent No CN 307112688 S (application No 202130634747.3) · Chinese design patent publication and EUIPO DesignView portal · disclosed 2022-02-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity on the ground that the contested charging-station design lacked novelty because it copied an earlier Chinese design patent disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Chinese design patent CN 307112688 S, its English translation, and a DesignView extract to prove prior disclosure and identity of the designs.
  • The holders filed no observations, and the Division accepted publication of the earlier Chinese design on 15 February 2022 as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • The Division found no differences between the prior and contested designs, held the contested RCD not new under Article 5(1)(b) CDR, and declared it invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138