DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008529085-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-03

000119180

Contested design: 008529085-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085290850001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vieira Araújo, S.A.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua de S. Roque, n.º104, 3700-273 São João da Madeira, Portugal

Represented by

Paulo Rui Da Silva Pelayo de Sousa Henriques

Holder · RCD owner

PPACK - Sociedade Unipessoal

Portugal (PT)

Rua D. Crisóstomo de Aguiar, n.º187, 3720394 Vila de Cucujães, Portugal

Represented by

Márcia Isabel Martinho da Rosa

Prior art cited (2)

Prior use

green handle for carrying bottles

HANDLE PG.38.08 · invoices and email correspondence

Registered RCD

carrying handle for bottles

RCD No 0026821790001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-04-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on prior use of HANDLE PG.38.08 and earlier RCD No 0026821790001 for bottle-carrying handles.
  • The holder argued design freedom was constrained by bottle-neck standards and that visible differences in the rim, ribs, arm connection, transition zone, and grip created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of RCD No 0026821790001 through its 28/04/2015 bulletin publication and found designer freedom substantially high apart from compatibility constraints.
  • It held the identified differences had limited visual impact and did not change the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098