DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009151111-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-14

000121382

Contested design: 009151111-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0091511110002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Lanneng Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 208, 2F, Building A, Village South Industrial Zone, No. 27, District 1, Shuidoulaowei Village, Yousong Community, Longhua Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen City 518000, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Holder · RCD owner

White & Fluffy Vertriebs GmbH

Germany (DE)

Hauptstrasse 5, 82223 Eichenau, Germany

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

electrical power pack

Chinese design patent No CN 306794225 S (application No 202130115949.7) · China · disclosed 2021-08-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested electrical power pack lacked novelty and individual character because earlier Chinese design patent CN 306794225 S had been published before filing and showed an almost identical design.
  • The holder was invited to submit observations on the invalidity application but did not reply.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Chinese design patent under Article 7(1) CDR and found that differences in body lines, symbols, screen indications, and colours did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • Because the contested design produced the same overall impression as the prior design and therefore lacked individual character, the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138