DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008055354-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-09-08

000118731

Contested design: 008055354-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008055354-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Diesel S.P.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dell’Industria 4-6, 36042 Breganze (VI), Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Vichy Víz Korlátolt Felelősségű Tárasság

Hungary (HU)

Szadai út 981/59. A. ép. 3. lház., 2112 Veresegyház, Hungary

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

box of 'Diesel Plus Plus Feminine' perfume

https://www.perfumemaster.com · perfumemaster.com

Web disclosureD2

box of 'Diesel Plus Plus Masculine' perfume

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-S3Kkpx4Eg · YouTube · disclosed 2011-11-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested perfume-box design copied the Diesel Plus Plus box and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • Holder disputed disclosure, arguing the internet evidence was printed later than the filing date and did not reliably prove earlier publication.
  • The Division accepted Annex 2 and the YouTube video as reliable prior web disclosures of two earlier box designs, D1 and D2.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design declared invalid, and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098