DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006645693-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-10

000119261

Contested design: 006645693-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 006645693-0002 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 006645693-0002. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiques société par actions simplifiée à associé uniquevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

FACA France Recipients Pour Cosmetique S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ctra.del Mig, 1-13, 08940 Cornellà de Llobregat, España

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

cosmetic jar

RCD No 002341909-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-11-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier cosmetic-container designs, including prior RCD No 002341909-0003.
  • The holder disputed admissibility and disclosure, argued the earlier evidence was insufficient, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the supplementary EUIPO register evidence, found prior RCD No 002341909-0003 properly disclosed, and considered the designer's freedom not particularly limited.
  • Comparing the protected features, the Division found the contested design produced the same overall impression as the earlier design and declared the RCD invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098