DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006350351-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-25

000121359

Contested design: 006350351-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 008146088-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008146088-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Jiuyi Electronics & Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

West-No. 169 Huishi RD, Jishigang Town, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China

Holder · RCD owner

Ling Wang

Belgium (BE)

Domien Liekenslaan 6, 3140 Keerbergen, Belgium

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Direct plug in power meter

Intertek certificate No 16SNHO118-02; test report No 151201324SHA-001 · Invoice for shipment from China to Gdansk, Poland, corroborated by Intertek CDF and test report · disclosed 2018-04-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design lacked novelty because an identical plug-in power meter was evidenced by Intertek certification documents and had been sold at least by 12/04/2018.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the certificate, CDF and test report were linked, and the invoice corroborated that the prior design had been put on the market and publicly disclosed under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found them identical apart from immaterial informational stickers, so the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138