DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008708408-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-17

000122394

Contested design: 008708408-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008708408-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yahui Fuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Nanjie Village, Chengguan Town, Xinmi City, Henan Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Howsan Technology Co., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

F1201, E202, Building 78, No. 4 Industrial Zone, Mashantou Community, Matian Street, Guangming District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for a table lamp product called "Lovebay 2 Piece Bedside Lamp Touch…"

ASIN No B 08S 6WZ RL7 · Amazon (amazon.de) · disclosed 2021-04-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested table lamp design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier public disclosures, including an Amazon listing predating the filing date.
  • The holder did not file observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.de offer page as sufficient internet disclosure from 29/04/2021 and found a broad designer freedom for table lamp appearance.
  • It held that the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior lamp design, so it lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268