DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015014613-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-08

000122594

Contested design: 015014613-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015014613-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ziou Divia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 3-152, Xiashama Village, Datian Street, Linhai City, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, 317099, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Haijun Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 12-8, Yumin New Village, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province 318000, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

KESSER Light Tree birch tree lighting decoration

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 0BG 2Q7 SKN · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-09-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon.de disclosure of a nearly identical light-tree design from 21/09/2022.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, novelty, or individual character.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon screenshots as sufficient proof of disclosure under Article 7 and found the designer’s freedom very broad for decorative LED light products.
  • The Division found only minor differences between the designs, held that the contested design lacked individual character, upheld the application, and declared the design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268