DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008721062-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-08

000122618

Contested design: 008721062-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0087210620001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

J & D Tech Incvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

120 Lake Ave S Ste 22, Nesconset New York 11767-1060, United States

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Holder · RCD owner

Liuyan Guovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 302, No. 17, Junlan Second Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1⚠ rejected as evidence

Product indicated as prior design on an Amazon listing

https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B08GCGLHQ3 · Amazon.de

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

Screenshot of a product offered on the Amazon website

https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested storage-bag design lacked novelty and individual character in light of an earlier Amazon-published design.
  • To support invalidity, the applicant relied on an Amazon product hyperlink, an INID code, and a screenshot said to show the earlier design.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found that neither D1 nor D2 proved a prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR, so the invalidity grounds under Articles 5 and 6 failed.
  • The application was rejected as unfounded, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder’s representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097