DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008721062-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-08

000123334

Contested design: 008721062-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008721062-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

J & D TECH INCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

120 Lake Ave S Ste 22, Nesconset, New York 11767-1060, United States

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Holder · RCD owner

Liuyan Guovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 302, No. 17, Junlan Second Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 2

Amazon offer for 'saijer Hanging Handbag Storage'

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 08F X6Y N8X · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-08-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested storage-bag design lacked individual character over earlier designs, relying in particular on an Amazon listing for 'saijer Hanging Handbag Storage' available since 14 August 2020.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, designer freedom, or the applicant's comparison.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) and found broad designer freedom apart from basic storage-bag features.
  • Despite color differences, the designs shared the same shape, pocket arrangement, proportions, and hanging system, producing the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098