DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008320014-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-23

000121565

Contested design: 008320014-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008320014-0004 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vimar S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Viale Vicenza, 14, 36063 Marostica (Vicenza), Italia

Holder · RCD owner

4 Box s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Brunelleschi, 16, 20146 Milano, Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

electrical socket shown in the bticino catalog

HC4140/16W · bticino catalog "Valore superiore su tutta la linea"

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and at least lack of individual character, relying mainly on an earlier bticino catalog disclosure of socket model HC4140/16W.
  • The holder argued the dashed cuboid should be disregarded, the socket shape was not dictated exclusively by technical standards, the design remained new and individual, and the market was crowded.
  • The Division accepted the 2005 bticino catalog as prior disclosure, found only limited design freedom, and held that the common socket features outweighed the minor differences in the external rectangular element.
  • The contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user as the earlier model, so the application was upheld and the design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138