DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008213599-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-23

000122974

Contested design: 008213599-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, and Registered Community design No 008213599-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008213599-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Weirui Yangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.3333, 3/F, Shenzhou Computer Building, Beier Road, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Sylvie Noachovitch

Holder · RCD owner

Liu, Hangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group 3, Gonggou Village, Zhongxing Town, Jiajiang County, Leshan, China

Represented by

Asternery S.L

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for the 'Luoatip 20 W USB C Fast Charger' mobile phone battery charger

ASIN B 088 2SG 52T; https://www.amazon.de · Amazon · disclosed 2020-05-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty based on an earlier mobile phone charger design disclosed online before the contested design's filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon printouts showing the Luoatip charger, ASIN B 088 2SG 52T, offered since 05/05/2020 and reviewed with product images on 01/09/2020.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the disclosure evidence and the applicant's comparison were unrebutted.
  • The Division found the earlier charger disclosed under Article 7(1) CDR and identical in all essential features, with only an immaterial shade difference.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138