DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002841650-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-04

000120519

Contested design: 002841650-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002841650-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Luxrad Polska Mazur i Wspólnicy Spółka Komandytowo-Akcyjnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Parkowa 1, 05800 Pruszków, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Instal Projekt Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Jana Pawła II 12A, Nowa Wieś k/Włocławka, 87-853 Kruszyn, Poland

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

'NAMELESS' radiator shown in Facebook posts from a third-party profile

Facebook account “Дизайн-радиаторы Instal Projekt в Молдове” · disclosed 2014-09-30

CatalogD2

'NAMELESS' radiator shown in Instal Projekt technical catalogue with drawings

GRZEJNIKI DLA PROFESJONALISTY / RADIATORS FOR A PRO · Instal Projekt catalogue · disclosed 2014-10-15

CatalogD3

'NAMELESS' radiator offered in Leroy Merlin catalogue

Leroy Merlin grzejniki 2014/2015 collection · Leroy Merlin catalogue · disclosed 2014-10-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosures of the same radiator model before the grace period.
  • Holder challenged the reliability and public availability of the Facebook post and catalogues, and argued the contested design remained new and individually distinctive.
  • The Division found the Facebook and catalogue evidence credible and sufficient to establish prior disclosure, especially the holder’s 15/10/2014 catalogue entry for the NAMELESS radiator.
  • Given the high degree of design freedom, the extra horizontal element per segment did not change the overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238