DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015009672-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-04

000121480

Contested design: 015009672-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité est accueillie. 2. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 015009672-0001 est déclaré nul. 3. Le titulaire supporte les frais, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Monegasque de Distribution S.A.M.via PDF extraction

MC

1, rue Du Gabian - Le Thalès Bloc A, 98000 Monaco, Monaco

Holder · RCD owner

Gregory Youhnovskivia PDF extraction

France (FR)

122 rue du Commandant Rolland - Le Chambord 2 -, 13008 Marseille, France

Represented by

Legabrand

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Gifi online catalogue page for Kit Colis Express 8 Sachets

https://www.icatalogue.fr/i/gifi/kit-colis-express-8-sachets-376857 · icatalogue.fr / Gifi online catalogue · disclosed 2021-05-11

Web disclosureD2

Gifi Facebook page with dated comment

Facebook / Gifi · disclosed 2021-05-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested packaging design lacked novelty because the same Gifi Kit Colis Express design had been publicly marketed online more than 12 months before 25 January 2023.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, saying the screenshots were insufficiently dated and unclear for reliable comparison, and also maintained the contested design had individual character.
  • The Division found the online catalogue page and Facebook material clearly identified the prior design and showed disclosures in May 2021, outside any grace period.
  • Comparing D1, D2, and the contested design, the Division found no observable differences and concluded the contested design was not new under Article 5(1)(b).
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.0519.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098