DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009095425-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-06

000120580

Contested design: 009095425-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0090954250002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huaiqing Huvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1099 Hujiagou Village, Caijiaya Township, Xing County, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Yuzhao Jinvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 63, Dist. 3, DaoYuVil., Xicheng St., Huangyan Dist., Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

METIDA

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

toilet seat adapter for babies

CN 307172456 S (application No 202130784761.1) · China · disclosed 2022-03-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Chinese design patent for a baby toilet seat.
  • The holder argued the prior design was not properly proven or translated and, in any event, the designs differed in visible features and overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Chinese design patent publication despite the late translation and found the designer's freedom at least average.
  • The shared body shape, suspended seat, handles, legs and steps dominated minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238