DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009095425-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-06

000120581

Contested design: 009095425-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009095425-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huaiqing Huvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1099 Hujiagou Village, Caijiaya Township, Xing County, Shanxi Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Yuzhao Jinvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 63, Dist. 3, DaoYuVil., Xicheng St., Huangyan Dist., Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

METIDA

Prior art cited (1)

National design

toilet seat adapter for babies

CN 305367890 S (application No 201930252225.X) · China · disclosed 2019-09-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested baby toilet-seat adapter lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier Chinese design publication.
  • Holder challenged disclosure and substantiation, then argued visible differences in patterns, seat shape, handles and construction created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Chinese design through its published patent document despite the late translation and rejected the holder's evidentiary objections.
  • Given at least average design freedom, the Division found the shared body, seat, handles, legs and steps dominated the minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238