DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009019045-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-17

000120178

Contested design: 009019045-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0090190450001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BJS Creative Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Kiełmina 63, 95010 Stryków, Poland

Represented by

EUPATENT.PL

Holder · RCD owner

Jerzy Pietrucha BUSINESS ASSETS

Poland (PL)

Przemysłowa 10, 98235 Błaszki, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

open-top culvert

RCD No 0052534160001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-05-18

Registered RCDD2

open-top culvert

RCD No 0075470700001

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCDs D1 and D2, arguing the contested open-top culvert had essentially the same form, proportions, and overall appearance.
  • The holder disputed the informed user and designer freedom, claimed D2 could not be relied on after invalidation, sought suspension pending an attack on D1, and argued technical constraints made the differences decisive.
  • The Division refused suspension, held disclosure of D1 was proven by its bulletin publication, and found the designer retained broad freedom despite the product’s technical function.
  • It concluded that the shared V-shaped gutter channel and wing configuration dominated the overall impression, the differences were minor or largely hidden in use, and the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238