DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000096102-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-19

000120583

Contested design: 000096102-0005

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0000961020005 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

trilatec GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Forsthausstraße 10, 66663 Merzig, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Eltete Tpm Oyvia PDF extraction

Finland (FI)

Varastokuja 5, 07900 Loviisa, Finland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 3(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested design was invalid under Article 25(1)(a) because its views were inconsistent and did not depict one single design under Article 3(a).
  • The holder replied that the applicant's 3D reconstruction lacked evidential value and that apparent discrepancies could result from projection methods and perspective.
  • The Division held that the views must be read together, exact measurements are not part of the claimed protection, and any differences do not prevent clear identification of one design.
  • The invalidity ground under Article 25(1)(a) was rejected, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(a)097
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(a)097
000108242

vs Miele & Cie. KG

2022-06-08Art 25(1)(a)097
000129508

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-23095
000129522

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-14095
000127995

vs Jaroslav Masopust

2026-02-06095
000129516

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14095
000128115

vs GREEN TEAM EUROPE A/S

2025-11-20095