DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015011005-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-03-25

000121694

Contested design: 015011005-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150110050001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Creative Bags S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Căminului nr. 71, Manolache, jud. Ilfov, Romania

Represented by

Marilena Comanescu

Holder · RCD owner

SC Flexomatei S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Balastierei nr. 6, 625100 Adjud, Vrancea, Romania

Represented by

Mara Cîju

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

pouches

RCD No 0002985670001 · Community Design Bulletin · disclosed 2005-04-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier published RCD for pouches.
  • The holder argued prior Benelux registration and Romanian copyright, and said differences in shape, colors, and construction created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held the earlier RCD was properly disclosed by publication and that copyright or Benelux claims were irrelevant to assessing the registered contested design.
  • Given broad design freedom for food paper bags, the differences were minor and the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098