DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015008551-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-08

000123357

Contested design: 015008551-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015008551-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liu Rongpingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 102, Building 18, Dongfangjiayuan, Dingshu Town, Yixing City 214221, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Hefengjiada Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1/F, N2 Shunxing Industrial Zone, N10, Zhongxing Rd, Maantang Community, Bantian Sub-Dist, Longgang Dist, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

H&A

Prior art cited (2)

National designenclosure 2

Corona machine ceramic tube

CN 302341605 S · China design patent publication · disclosed 2013-03-06

Otherenclosure 3⚠ rejected as evidence

Examples and representations of existing ceramic discharge electrodes

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over an earlier Chinese design and argued any differences in length were minor.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier Chinese design had been validly disclosed and considered the enclosure-3 examples insufficiently proven as prior art.
  • Comparing the designs as a whole, the Division found only minor differences in grooves and edge sharpness, producing the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138