DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008856033-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-15

000122254

Contested design: 008856033-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008856033-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LIU HANGvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group 3, Gonggou Village, Zhongxing Town, Jiajiang County, Leshan, China

Represented by

Thomas-Johannes Jochheim

Holder · RCD owner

Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm. 1910, Unit 1, Building 1, Jingfu Community, Hongmian West Rd., Changjiang Li Autonomous County 572799, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

white contact plug shown in a YouTube video

YouTube · disclosed 2020-12-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier online disclosures of a contact plug and also invoking Article 25(1)(d) CDR.
  • The holder challenged the screenshots as unreliable because they were undated, lacked a visible URL, and did not show identical designs.
  • The Division found the YouTube screenshots sufficiently proved disclosure on 2020-12-10 and held that no translation or further web search was required.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found the only difference in the pins immaterial, so the designs were identical for Article 5(2) CDR purposes.
  • The application was upheld on novelty grounds and the contested design was declared invalid, so the other ground and other earlier designs were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138