DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004561132-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-19

000121775

Contested design: 004561132-0001

CDRRCD lapsed at decision

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004561132-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tomasz Mentelvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Brzezina 76, 49300 Brzeg, Poland

Represented by

Anna Korbela, Marek Andrzej Besler

Holder · RCD owner

Marcin Nykiel, MPM Projektvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Roźwienica 111, 37565 Roźwienica, Poland

Represented by

Katarzyna Sas

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAttachment 2

online forum extracts showing the ceramic vortex burner in the holder's boiler

https://forum.infoogrzewanie.pl/ · forum.infoogrzewanie.pl · disclosed 2016-03-25

Web disclosureAttachment 3

YouTube video sequences concerning the MPM DS 19 boiler showing the ceramic vortex burner

YouTube · disclosed 2017-03-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the burner embodied in the contested design is an internal boiler part with features solely dictated by technical function and hardly visible in normal use.
  • Applicant relied on a forum disclosure, a YouTube video, and the holder's boiler manual; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the burner's shape and six holes serve combustion and airflow requirements and do not play any aesthetic role in the boiler's appearance.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 8(1), without examining the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238