DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015001255-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-15

000122696

Contested design: 015001255-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 015001255-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fei Songvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 1, Floor 6, Unit 2, Building 14, South, No. 105, Cuihua Road, Yanta District, Xi'an City Shaanxi Province, China

Represented by

METIDA

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaotao Zhengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 122, Housan Street, Guangxiang Road, Nanli, Xiashan Street, Chaonan District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

white loose powder box / cosmetic box shown in an online sales offer

https://detail.1688.com · 1688.com (Alibaba Group) · disclosed 2019-07-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested cosmetic box lacked novelty and individual character because an identical box had been offered online before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed internet disclosure, argued the Chinese website would not normally become known to EU trade circles, and claimed minor design differences mattered in a crowded sector.
  • The Division found the 1688.com printout and pre-filing user reviews sufficient to prove disclosure, and held the holder had not rebutted accessibility to specialised EU circles.
  • Given broad designer freedom and the very similar overall form of the boxes, the contested design created the same overall impression as D1 and was invalidated; costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098