DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015000794-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-04

000123734

Contested design: 015000794-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015000794-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jziaqtie LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 382 3rd Floor 21 Hill Street, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire SA61 1QQ, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Huisa Trading Co. Ltd

China (CN)

Room 101, No.13, Wushi 1st Road, Wushi Village, Zhongxin Town, Zengcheng District, Guangzhou City 511300, China

Prior art cited (1)

National design

lithium battery

UK design No 6228271 · GOV.UK portal · disclosed 2022-09-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested battery design lacked novelty and individual character because very similar earlier designs were already available before the filing date.
  • To support invalidity, the applicant relied in particular on a GOV.UK extract for UK design No 6228271 for a lithium battery, published before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division found the prior UK design had been validly disclosed and was identical to the contested design.
  • The Division upheld the application on novelty grounds under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 5, so it did not assess the separate individual-character ground.

Deciding panel

  • MemberČELIŠOVÁ Ludmila
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138