DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006272522-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-06-27

000121523

Contested design: 006272522-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006272522-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Przedsiębiorstwo, ‘Ttoolco\’ Kazimierz Mitroszewskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Komunalna 11, 15-197 Białystok, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Wirplast– Więcek Spółka Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Stawowa 9a, 42-287 Babienica, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

ventilation fittings

RCD No 005289642-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-06-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier ventilation-element designs disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the contested design differed in grooves, cover shape, vents and the prominent WIRPLAST mark, and that functional constraints narrowed design freedom.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of prior RCD No 005289642-0001, found no proven severe limits on design freedom, and considered the shared shape features dominant overall.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design produced no different overall impression on the informed user and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238