DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006480083-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-12

000122794

Contested design: 006480083-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006480083-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lan Xiaojinvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building 3, Phase II, Luofu Garden, Changning Town, Boluo County, Huizhou City, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm. 1910, Unit 1, Building 1, Jingfu Community, Hongmian West Rd., Changjiang Li Autonomous County 572799 China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

battery charger

RCD No 002630673-0003 · Community Design Bulletin · disclosed 2015-05-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier RCD No 002630673-0003 and arguing the contested charger replicated the prior design series.
  • The holder argued the application was effectively limited to design No 002630673-0001 and that the contested charger's unified structure, circular top, and dual-thickness USB cable created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held the application covered the whole prior series, accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, found only limited design freedom, and considered the differences too minor to alter the overall impression.
  • The Division concluded the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, declared it invalid, and ordered the holder to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138