DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015042992-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-25

000124337

Contested design: 015042992-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150429920001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Li Pingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

3rd Floor, Jinxin Industrial Zone, No. 112 Kangyi Road, Qingxi Town, Dongguan, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Cool Zero Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 2906, Building B, Zhongshen Garden, No.2010 Caitian Road, Fushan Community, Futian St., Futian Dist., Shenzhen 518016, China

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

prior ventilating fan design shown in a YouTube video still

YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested ventilating-fan design copied an earlier YouTube-disclosed design and therefore lacked novelty and individual character.
  • Holder requested an extension but ultimately filed no substantive observations, so the invalidity application was undefended on the merits.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshot and hyperlink as sufficient proof of prior disclosure and found the informed user would perceive the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238