DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008721062-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-01

000124935

Contested design: 008721062-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0087210620001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

J & D Tech INCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

120 Lake Ave S Ste 22, Nesconset New York 117671060 United States

Represented by

André Guerreiro Rodrigues

Holder · RCD owner

Liuyan GUO

China (CN)

Room 302, No. 17, Junlan Second Street, Panyu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province 510000 China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Lirex Handbag Organiser Hanging, 8 Pockets, Handbag, Storage Organiser, Oxford Fabric, Hanging Shelf, Wardrobe Organiser for Family Wardrobe, Bedroom

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B08GCGLHQ3 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-10-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested storage-bag design lacked individual character over an earlier Amazon-disclosed organiser design available before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, designer freedom, or the comparison of overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) and found broad design freedom for storage bags.
  • It held that the shared shape, proportions, eight pockets, and hanging arrangement outweighed colour differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098