DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005770500-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-08

000123816

Contested design: 005770500-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 005770500-0008. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mikomika Internation SLvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Prim 20, Planta 1, Puerta 4, 13250 Daimiel, España

Holder · RCD owner

Stor,S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Paseo General Martínez Campos, 53, 28010 Madrid, España

Represented by

Lerroux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

LARQ bottle shown on archived website and YouTube profile

https://www.livelarq.com/; https://www.youtube.com/@livelarq/videos · Internet Archive / YouTube · disclosed 2018-04-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on prior online disclosures of the LARQ bottle before 8 October 2018.
  • The holder challenged the evidence as untranslated and insufficient, invoked the Article 7(2) grace period, and argued the compared bottle designs created different overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive and YouTube materials as sufficient proof that D1 was publicly disclosed and found the Article 7(2) exception unproven.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the strong similarity of the cylindrical bottle body, neck, and flush cap, the contested design produced the same overall impression as D1.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098