DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015047101-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-09-05

000124999

Contested design: 015047101-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0150471010001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kemes Commerce GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Rolandstraße 23, 52134 Herzogenrath, Germany

Represented by

Schnick & Garrels

Holder · RCD owner

Europapa Handels GmbH

Germany (DE)

Am Bahndamm 5, 41334, Nettetal, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

packaging cartons

RCD No 0150279140001 · Community design register · disclosed 2023-07-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 0150279140001, arguing the box shape dominated and the graphics were secondary.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the contested design's colours and graphical layout formed part of the overall impression and materially differentiated it.
  • The Division found the contested design had individual character and novelty over the prior design, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129508

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-23Art 25(1)(b)097
000129522

vs Messerle GmbH

2026-04-14Art 25(1)(b)097
000127995

vs Jaroslav Masopust

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000129516

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14Art 25(1)(b)097
000128115

vs GREEN TEAM EUROPE A/S

2025-11-20Art 25(1)(b)097
000123774

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)097
000123875

vs Multiple Products B.V.

2024-10-15Art 25(1)(b)097
000124459

vs Gusta Garden GmbH

2024-10-04Art 25(1)(b)097