DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008629117-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-14

000126032

Contested design: 008629117-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008629117-0009 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYIvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Stada Arzneimittel AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stadastr. 2-18, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Deutschland

Represented by

Harmsen Utescher

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

older label design shown on archived aliud.de webpages

https://web.archive.org/web/20160403065902/http://www.aliud.de/arzneimittel/rezeptfreie-arzneimittel/; https://web.archive.org/web/20160319195501im_/http://www.aliud.de/media/527236/product-icon_0008_harnansaeuerung.jpg · Internet Archive Wayback Machine / aliud.de · disclosed 2016-03-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that identical prior design D1 had been disclosed before the 26 July 2021 filing date.
  • To prove disclosure, the applicant filed Wayback Machine screenshots and archived aliud.de URLs dated 19 March 2016 and 3 April 2016.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found D1 had been validly disclosed online under Article 7 and that the compared designs were identical with no discernible differences.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198