DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008629117-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-14

000126061

Contested design: 008629117-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted; Registered Community design No. 008629117-0007 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008629117-0007 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYIvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Stada Arzneimittel AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stadastr. 2-18, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Deutschland

Represented by

Harmsen Utescher

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

earlier label design shown on archived Agnus Castus AL web pages

https://web.archive.org/web/20160116234910/http://www.aliud.de/arzneimittel/rezeptfreie-arzneimittel/agnus-castus-al/ ; https://web.archive.org/web/20160506115414im_/https://fachwelt.aliud.de/umbraco/api/resource/getpublicimage?id=15128 · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2016-01-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that an identical earlier design, D1, had already been disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Internet Archive Wayback Machine screenshots from January and May 2016 showing D1; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the archived web evidence sufficient to prove public disclosure of D1 under Article 7(1) CDR before the contested design's 2021 filing date.
  • Using the contested design as the reference point, the Division held it identical to D1 apart from non-relevant added verbal and figurative matter, so novelty was lacking and the RCD was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198