DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008629117-0026

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-14

000126077

Contested design: 008629117-0026

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted, the contested Community design No. 008629117-0026 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008629117-0026 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Association GYIvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

78, allée Primavera Centre Ubidoca 20837, 74370 Annecy, Frankreich

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Stada Arzneimittel AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stadastr. 2-18, 61118 Bad Vilbel, Deutschland

Represented by

Harmsen Utescher

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

older design shown on Aliud pharmaceutical product web pages/images for labels

https://web.archive.org/web/20160403065902/http://www.aliud.de/arzneimittel/rezeptfreie-arzneimittel/ ; https://web.archive.org/web/20160319195455im_/http://www.aliud.de/media/527230/product-icon_0002_schmerzenfieber.jpg · Internet Archive Wayback Machine / aliud.de · disclosed 2016-03-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on an earlier identical design disclosed online as D1 before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Wayback Machine evidence as proving public disclosure of D1 in 2016 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found no discernible differences between D1 and the contested design, so the design lacked novelty.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198